（プラトンを読んだことのない方は、英訳者による"INTRODUCTION TO CRITO"に目を通す事をお勧めします。
Translated by BENJAMIN JOWETT
INTRODUCTION TO CRITO (by Benjamin Jowett)
THE "Crito" seems intended to exhibit the character of Socrates in
one light only, not as the philosopher, fulfilling a divine mission
and trusting in the will of Heaven, but simply as the good citizen,
who having been unjustly condemned is willing to give up his life
in obedience to the laws of the State.
The days of Socrates are drawing to a close; the fatal ship  has
been seen off Sunium, as he is informed by his aged friend and
contemporary Crito, who visits him before the dawn has broken; he
himself has been warned in a dream that on the third day he must
depart. Time is precious and Crito has come early in order to gain
his consent to a plan of escape. This can be easily accomplished by
his friends, who will incur no danger in making the attempt to save
him, but will be disgraced forever if they allow him to perish. He
should think of his duty to his children, and not play into the
hands of his enemies. Money is already provided by Crito as well as
by Simmias and others, and he will have no difficulty in finding
friends in Thessaly and other places.
Socrates is afraid that Crito is but pressing upon him the opinions
of the many: whereas, all his life long he has followed the dictates
of reason only and the opinion of the one wise or skilled man. There
was a time when Crito himself had allowed the propriety of this. And
although someone will say "The many can kill us," that makes no
difference; but a good life, that is to say a just and honorable life,
is alone to be valued. All considerations of loss of reputation or
injury to his children should be dismissed: the only question is
whether he would be right in attempting to escape. Crito, who is a
disinterested person, not having the fear of death before his eyes,
shall answer this for him. Before he was condemned they had often
held discussions, in which they agreed that no man should either
do evil, or return evil for evil, or betray the right. Are these
principles to be altered because the circumstances of Socrates are
altered? Crito admits that they remain the same. Then is his escape
consistent with the maintenance of them? To this Crito is unable or
unwilling to reply.
Socrates proceeds: Suppose the laws of Athens to come and
remonstrate with him: they will ask, "Why does he seek to overturn
them?" and if he replies, "They have injured him," will not the
laws answer, "Yes, but was that the agreement? Has he any objection
to make to them which would justify him in overturning them? Was he
not brought into the world and educated by their help, and are they
not his parents? He might have left Athens and gone where he pleased,
but he has lived there for seventy years more constantly than any
other citizen." Thus he has clearly shown that he acknowledged the
agreement which he cannot now break without dishonor to himself and
danger to his friends. Even in the course of the trial he might have
proposed exile as the penalty, but then he declared that he preferred
death to exile. And whither will he direct his footsteps? In any
well-ordered State the laws will consider him as an enemy. Possibly
in a land of misrule like Thessaly he may be welcomed at first, and
the unseemly narrative of his escape regarded by the inhabitants as
an amusing tale. But if he offends them he will have to learn another
sort of lesson. Will he continue to give lectures in virtue? That
would hardly be decent. And how will his children be the gainers if
he takes them into Thessaly, and deprives them of Athenian
citizenship? Or if he leaves them behind, does he expect that they
will be better taken care of by his friends because he is in
Thessaly? Will not true friends care for them equally whether he
is alive or dead?
Finally, they exhort him to think of justice first, and of life
and children afterwards. He may now depart in peace and innocence,
a sufferer and not a doer of evil. But if he breaks agreements,
and returns evil for evil, they will be angry with him while he
lives; and their brethren, the laws of the world below, will
receive him as an enemy. Such is the mystic voice which is always
murmuring in his ears.
That Socrates was not a good citizen was a charge made against him
during his lifetime, which has been often repeated in later ages.
The crimes of Alcibiades, Critias, and Charmides, who had been his
pupils, were still recent in the memory of the now restored democracy.
The fact that he had been neutral in the death struggle of Athens
was not likely to conciliate popular good-will. Plato, writing
probably in the next generation, undertakes the defence of his
friend and master in this particular, not to the Athenians of his
day, but to posterity and the world at large.
Whether such an incident ever really occurred as the visit of Crito
and the proposal of escape is uncertain: Plato could easily have
invented far more than that; and in the selection of Crito, the
aged friend, as the fittest person to make the proposal to Socrates,
we seem to recognize the hand of the artist. Whether anyone who has
been subjected by the laws of his country to an unjust judgment is
right in attempting to escape is a thesis about which casuists might
disagree. Shelley is of opinion that Socrates "did well to die," but
not for the "sophistical" reasons which Plato has put into his mouth.
And there would be no difficulty in arguing that Socrates should have
lived and preferred to a glorious death the good which he might still
be able to perform. "A skillful rhetorician would have had much to say
about that" (50 C). It may be remarked, however, that Plato never
intended to answer the question of casuistry, but only to exhibit the
ideal of patient virtue which refuses to do the least evil in order
to avoid the greatest, and to show Socrates, his master, maintaining
in death the opinions which he had professed in his life. Not "the
world," but the "one wise man," is still the philosopher's paradox
in his last hours.
 The sacred ship, during whose thirty days' voyage to and from
the oracle at Delos no Athenian citizen could be put to death.
From DIALOGUES OF PLATO, New York, P.F. Collier & Son.
Copyright 1900 The Colonial Press.
This was scanned from the 1900 edition and mechanically checked
against a commercial copy of Crito from CDROM. Differences were
corrected against the paper edition. The text itself is thus a
highly accurate rendition.
This text is in the PUBLIC DOMAIN, released August 1993.
「読む楽しみ」に戻る top pageに戻る